Regardless that Portland is the hippest thing since sliced tofu (even though Brooklyners beg to differ), when the end of January comes along it's always clear that I live in the valley of death. Oh, sure, there's a bit of Old Wives Tale in that adage about Willamette Valley's Native American translation, but if you look around at the pallid faces, the wadded Kleenex, the lines at the supermarket pharmacies--you'll have to concede that when it comes to prolonged post-nasal drip, the Pacific Northwest rules.
The stack of medicines in the photo? Currently, they are the regime of my husband, but we like to play "tag--you're it" with our winter crud, so next week, I'm sure it'll be me squeezing saline into my brain via clogged nasal passages. I'll be the one hacking up phlegm at 3 in the morning.
Ten years ago, I was writer-in-residence at Fishtrap. With two of my three kids, I ventured to the Wallowas for the winter to hole up in a riverside cabin to write and teach. Idyllic, yes? Well, sure, sort of. The writing, teaching and out-in-nature part was terrific. The not-so-terrific part was that my kids were sicker out there than they've ever been. Infections, febrile seizure-inducing fevers, trips to the emergency room via ambulance, cool compresses and hot toddies. There was this Little House on the Prairie feel, complete with aggressive deer that attacked us with their craven hoofs as we made our way to the minivan, my 2-yr-old swaddled in a quilt.
Thankfully, this neighborhood I live in now has a dearth of deer--aggressive or otherwise. (Though our local coyotes and raccoons take down the occasional backyard chicken.) What we do have is plenty of mucus. Less dramatic than toddlers and fevers, but annoying, gross, and tenacious. The plus side? More downtime (aka writing time). The silver-lining on winter blech is word count (but remember to wash your hands before touching your keyboard)!
let's talk about writing
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
hot girls don't write
Today I spent an hour with middle schoolers in a creative writing classroom. As the mom of a 7th-grader, I wasn't going in there cold. But still. Remember that line from Anne Lamott about why she never wanted to have a girl? Seventh and eighth grade, she said. Or something like that.
Being a 13-year-old girl--particularly a shy, bookish 13-year-old girl--is a special sort of hell.And it's a special sort of hell that continues to deliver once you've grown beyond the experiences of a 13-year-old girl and somehow, miraculously, find yourself a middle aged female writer. Ergo, the writing exercise I trotted in with and presented to Ms. Andronescu's class.
The prompt was: during lunch in a school cafeteria, there are three kids. A popular kid, a shy kid, and a best friend (of either the shy OR the popular kid). The shy kid has baked some cookies and wants to give them to the popular kid. The prompt was embedded in a lesson on POV, so I asked the students to write a paragraph using the third person, and then, write the same scene choosing one of the characters as the first person narrator.
I did not specify gender, but surprise, only one of the students chose to make the shy cookie-bearer a boy. Most of the students eagerly read their accounts of bookish, shy girls tentatively approaching brazen popular boys with the carefully baked treats. They took care to describe wild heartbeats and skinny jeans and the plucky best friends who egged them on. And the boys in this particular class? One wrote that the shy girl had offered peanut butter cookies to the boy. He was allergic to peanuts and died before the end of the paragraph. Another boy wrote a sci-fi thriller in which a character was given an assignment to have a "crush." It was an amazingly detailed, voicey 3rd person piece, and the kid, I know, will have his potboilers lining bookstore shelves before he's thirty.
Last night, to prepare for my immersion in adolescent culture, over dinner I asked my son his opinion about the prompt. And, of course, I was fishing for information about the creative writing class itself (which, by the way, even if it were the only elective at the school, my son let me know, he would never, ever darken its door). I wondered if he knew any of the students, and what they were like. He didn't. And then he offered, "But I can guarantee you there are no hot girls in that class."
"Ex-cuse me?" I hammered back. "What makes you think that, Mr. Profiler?"
"Seriously, Mom, you have to trust me on this. Hot girls don't read and they don't write."
Okay, I admit, I'd had a glass of wine and my appropriate Mother-knows-best demeanor was a bit, ahem, askew. "For your information, lots of hot girls read. And my writer's group is filled with hot, um, women."
"Yeah, well, the hot girls I know aren't into that stuff."
"Okay, who would you rather spend time with, someone interesting and engaging and funny, or someone sort of boring, but really cute?"
"To spend time with, or kiss?"
"Huh?"
"Well, it makes a difference. If we're talking lip to lip contact, she has to be hot."
Now, my 12-year-old son is barely 85 pounds soaking wet. He's a little firecracker and, yes, he's garnered his share of freshly baked cookies (metaphorically speaking), but I still think of him as my baby--kissing? Where did that come from?
"I'll have you know that I would totally have been one of those girls signed up for Ms. Andronescu's creative writing class," I argued, while signaling the waiter for a second glass of wine. "I lived to read and write when I was your age."
He looked at me with his practiced smirk, beneath his ballcap, and he nodded. "No surprise there, Mom."
Being a 13-year-old girl--particularly a shy, bookish 13-year-old girl--is a special sort of hell.And it's a special sort of hell that continues to deliver once you've grown beyond the experiences of a 13-year-old girl and somehow, miraculously, find yourself a middle aged female writer. Ergo, the writing exercise I trotted in with and presented to Ms. Andronescu's class.
The prompt was: during lunch in a school cafeteria, there are three kids. A popular kid, a shy kid, and a best friend (of either the shy OR the popular kid). The shy kid has baked some cookies and wants to give them to the popular kid. The prompt was embedded in a lesson on POV, so I asked the students to write a paragraph using the third person, and then, write the same scene choosing one of the characters as the first person narrator.
I did not specify gender, but surprise, only one of the students chose to make the shy cookie-bearer a boy. Most of the students eagerly read their accounts of bookish, shy girls tentatively approaching brazen popular boys with the carefully baked treats. They took care to describe wild heartbeats and skinny jeans and the plucky best friends who egged them on. And the boys in this particular class? One wrote that the shy girl had offered peanut butter cookies to the boy. He was allergic to peanuts and died before the end of the paragraph. Another boy wrote a sci-fi thriller in which a character was given an assignment to have a "crush." It was an amazingly detailed, voicey 3rd person piece, and the kid, I know, will have his potboilers lining bookstore shelves before he's thirty.
Last night, to prepare for my immersion in adolescent culture, over dinner I asked my son his opinion about the prompt. And, of course, I was fishing for information about the creative writing class itself (which, by the way, even if it were the only elective at the school, my son let me know, he would never, ever darken its door). I wondered if he knew any of the students, and what they were like. He didn't. And then he offered, "But I can guarantee you there are no hot girls in that class."
"Ex-cuse me?" I hammered back. "What makes you think that, Mr. Profiler?"
"Seriously, Mom, you have to trust me on this. Hot girls don't read and they don't write."
Okay, I admit, I'd had a glass of wine and my appropriate Mother-knows-best demeanor was a bit, ahem, askew. "For your information, lots of hot girls read. And my writer's group is filled with hot, um, women."
"Yeah, well, the hot girls I know aren't into that stuff."
"Okay, who would you rather spend time with, someone interesting and engaging and funny, or someone sort of boring, but really cute?"
"To spend time with, or kiss?"
"Huh?"
"Well, it makes a difference. If we're talking lip to lip contact, she has to be hot."
Now, my 12-year-old son is barely 85 pounds soaking wet. He's a little firecracker and, yes, he's garnered his share of freshly baked cookies (metaphorically speaking), but I still think of him as my baby--kissing? Where did that come from?
"I'll have you know that I would totally have been one of those girls signed up for Ms. Andronescu's creative writing class," I argued, while signaling the waiter for a second glass of wine. "I lived to read and write when I was your age."
He looked at me with his practiced smirk, beneath his ballcap, and he nodded. "No surprise there, Mom."
Labels:
girls who write
Wednesday, January 04, 2012
writers and branding: an interview with Julia Stoops
I am very pleased to introduce my colleague Julia Stoops, who
not only designed the latest iteration of suzyvitello.com, but the first one as
well. Julia and I have worked together on branding and web projects for a
variety of artists and organizations over the years, and I’m thrilled that she
agreed to talk about visual identity, and how writers can benefit from giving some
thought to establishing a brand look and feel. Tonight she’ll join other
writers for a reading at Portland’s Blackbird Wine Shop.
According
to your tagline, you work with “changemakers” and “cultural innovators,” why do
you like working with people and companies that fit that description?
I love working with people and organizations that are forward
looking and inspired to do something innovative online. "Changemaker"
and "cultural innovator" are pretty broad categories. They cover
foundations and nonprofits that make direct, tangible contributions to social
justice issues. They also cover creative professionals, such as writers,
architects, musicians, and visual artists. Then there are the harder to define
"special projects," such as ones I’ve done for research
organizations. For instance, the site we made for antiquesamplers.org. In
essence we created an online museum for a huge private collection of antique
needlework samplers. It was exciting to come up with new ways in which these
textiles, made by young girls hundreds of years ago, could be shared and analyzed
online with a global audience.
How is your
approach to web design informed by your career in visual art and your
perspective as a writer?
I’m glad for the visual art background. Color theory, principles
of composition, visual symbol, and art history all inform my aesthetic choices
when I'm designing websites. And my time as a college teacher, designing and
teaching new courses, gave me skills in creating systems of information
communication where the parts can be independent but they also fit together to make
a whole. And learning the craft of creative writing grounded me in the
importance of the story, the big picture of the client's communication. I'm
always thinking, how is this client’s story going to come across to others,
particularly to the client's target audiences? And while I don’t do copywriting
for clients, I have a facility for establishing the big picture of the brand
and maintaining that vision through the months-long design/content/build
process.
What do you
see as the biggest mistake writers often make with their websites?
Many writers ignore the importance of establishing a visual
brand, and their resulting websites look dull and uninteresting. They get done
on the cheap, and the result is mediocre. Assuming a writer's work is
wonderful, why promote it in a mediocre way?
Why should
writers think about visually “branding” themselves? They’re writers, shouldn’t
their words just speak for themselves?
The idea that writers' words should speak for themselves is,
alas, not tenable in the 21st century. If it were true, books would still have
the featureless covers they did a hundred years ago. Books remain a strong medium
for entertainment and education, but getting your book noticed and bought means
facing the reality that it is competing with film, television, podcasts, video
games, and more. Information is cheap – it's attention that has become
expensive. Well known writers with established fan bases can (unfortunately) afford
to have mediocre websites, whereas lesser known writers have to work harder to
stand out. The reassuring thing is that going for a strong visual brand does
not detract from your writing. It's not like you have to change your work or
make aesthetic compromises. A strong visual brand that is aligned with your
vision can only enhance the perception of your work.
You just
launched a website for your novel, Parts Per Million. Why did you choose to do
a “novel” website instead of an “author” website?
Hmmm, good question! The honest answer is probably that I
don't quite think of myself as an "author" yet. Sure, I write, but
I'm not going to be comfortable with "author" until I'm published. Until
then I'm an artist/designer who one day followed a crazy compulsion to write down
a story that was stuck in her head, and after ten years of refinement, it’s ready
to go out into the world.
Also, author websites make more sense when the author has
more than one work. Or they teach writing or write book reviews or participate
in some other tangible literary activity. And although I am working on a second
novel, it's not ready to be talked about in detail. So at the moment I'm really
just a one trick pony. It’s a big, complex trick, so it seemed better to make a
website about the trick than about the pony.
And besides, there’s already a "portal" to my
various other websites at juliastoops.com ;-)
Where is it
all heading in the artistic website realm? More DIY? Less? Are you worried that
you’ll be phased out as more and more laypeople have access to the tools of
your trade?
DIY web technologies have revolutionized the ability for
creative professionals with low budgets to achieve a web presence. It's become
crucial to have a place of one's own on the web, to the point where even a
mediocre website is far better than no website.
But I'm not worried about being phased out, for three
reasons. Firstly, while everybody has access to DIY technologies such as
WordPress, Carbonmade, and Other People's Pixels, what these technologies give
you is templates. If you're fine with templates, then I say go for it. But if
you want to customize your site, then you need to get past a steep learning
curve to gain creative control over your site's structure, features, and
design. I've known creative professionals who've made their own custom sites
with a great deal of pulling out of hair and gnashing of teeth. If you have
lots of time, and no money, then that is your path.
The second reason is that the DIY tools are just mechanical
tools. They do nothing to help you bounce ideas around, identify priorities, clarify
your mission, vision, goals, target audiences, long-term measurables,
aesthetics, symbolism, fonts, color palette, and all the other details that do
into brand development. There will always be a need for this kind of expertise.
The third reason I don't fear being phased out is that these
days I do more brand development and design work with organizations than with
individuals. With their multiple stakeholders, dependent deadlines, and complex
goals, organizations don't want to soak up employee time learning DIY tools.
They often also want a full service design agency, and they understand the
value of having an outside perspective on what they do. Collaborating with an
agency like Blue Mouse Monkey makes it easier for them to communicate their
mission and value to the community.
Julia Stoops, a native of New Zealand, is a recipient of an Oregon
Arts Commission Fellowships for Literature and Visual Art. She has experience
in alternative radio news journalism and anti-war activism, as well as a
background teaching media studies, art and philosophy.
Currently Julia runs the branding and web design company she founded,
Blue Mouse Monkey. She is an alum of Portland's popular Pinewood Table writing
critique group, and has just completed a novel, PARTS PER MILLION.
Sunday, January 01, 2012
in with the new
It really is a total coincidence that my new website launched as the ball dropped, but it works for me. Metaphorically, metaphysically and a whole bunch of other meta ways. I've been writing, oh, 42 years or so if you count my kindergarten scribblings, so if you go by the whole Deuteronomy thing, that's six big fat slate-clearing beginnings as a writer. My last website was conceived in 2005, so there you have it. I release thee. Done.
Last New Year's I had all this anxiety and do-or-die energy. I began the year with a pretty dramatic cleanse (no coffee or booze or sugar for a month!). Shortly thereafter, I wangled myself a terrific agent, I finished (or so I thought) my young adult book, I also finished another draft of my other novel. I taught classes, took on new work and clients, erased nearly 20K of debt, turned 50, and managed the usual family crises and hectic soccer mom schedule. I could not have accomplished any of those things without the help of my fantastic husband, my brilliant business partner, and, of course, my terrific, star-studded writing group.
2011was full of aggressive energy. We (Kirk, Carson and I) barely stopped moving the whole year. We capped it off with a rip-roaring party last night where we also managed to raise some money for the social service agency where my daughter works. Kirk and I were clearing up the beer bottles and plastic champagne flutes and piles of poker chips at 2:00 a.m., both feeling pretty self-satisfied. And exhausted.
So. 2012? I'm not going to move quite as fast. I'm gong to slow down and hunker in, and finish stuff. Make the things I've started as beautiful as I can. Fix what's broken. Nurture and nest and celebrate. Take lots of "next right steps." I hope. Today marks my transition from partner in a thriving communications business, back to independent contractor and sole proprietor of my little word-smithing enterprise.
Tomorrow my writing group will be over, and we'll do our annual spewing of intentions, which is something I personally cherish, but many of my colleagues do not. Show of hands: writing resolutions/intentions, good? Bad? Indifferent?
Last New Year's I had all this anxiety and do-or-die energy. I began the year with a pretty dramatic cleanse (no coffee or booze or sugar for a month!). Shortly thereafter, I wangled myself a terrific agent, I finished (or so I thought) my young adult book, I also finished another draft of my other novel. I taught classes, took on new work and clients, erased nearly 20K of debt, turned 50, and managed the usual family crises and hectic soccer mom schedule. I could not have accomplished any of those things without the help of my fantastic husband, my brilliant business partner, and, of course, my terrific, star-studded writing group.
2011was full of aggressive energy. We (Kirk, Carson and I) barely stopped moving the whole year. We capped it off with a rip-roaring party last night where we also managed to raise some money for the social service agency where my daughter works. Kirk and I were clearing up the beer bottles and plastic champagne flutes and piles of poker chips at 2:00 a.m., both feeling pretty self-satisfied. And exhausted.
So. 2012? I'm not going to move quite as fast. I'm gong to slow down and hunker in, and finish stuff. Make the things I've started as beautiful as I can. Fix what's broken. Nurture and nest and celebrate. Take lots of "next right steps." I hope. Today marks my transition from partner in a thriving communications business, back to independent contractor and sole proprietor of my little word-smithing enterprise.
Tomorrow my writing group will be over, and we'll do our annual spewing of intentions, which is something I personally cherish, but many of my colleagues do not. Show of hands: writing resolutions/intentions, good? Bad? Indifferent?
Thursday, December 29, 2011
out with ye olde
So we're creeping up on the end of another jam-filled year and it's time to make some changes. Some years, I throw out all my underwear and buy new dainties to celebrate the turnover. Other years I fast. Once, I nearly burned down my house. But that wasn't on purpose.
In a few hours, I'll be saying good-bye to a little piece of myself. Nope, not getting a nose job. Or a divorce. I'm not euthanizing a pet. What I'm doing is, well, dumping my starter website for a new one. There, I admitted it. My hardworking, clever little flash pony of a website is going to that ephemeral corral in the sky, where it'll join other digital free agents (maybe there's a match.com for unattached websites? Think about it, an outerweb dating service?).
It really is dumb, what I'm doing, broadcasting this upcoming launch. It's worst practices to announce a website's birth before it's actually, um, born and has had its fingers and toes counted, but I'm thinking everyone's off on holiday, or watching basketball, or a movie, so, I'm doing it. Hard launching. Right here and now.
Poor Ira, my web developer, he's been laboring over this build--the new website is a bit of a princess (think, trophy wife), and she's given quite a headaches with all her frilly self-importance, but he's got her corset nearly laced, and sometime in the next 12 or 24 or 36 hours, the new suzyvitello will be unveiled. I hope.
So, farewell, little crab. I hope you meet someone really nice.
P.S. all you fans of the crab--the website's twin sister, wordsinahurry, is still going to be around, so you can get your flash fix.
In a few hours, I'll be saying good-bye to a little piece of myself. Nope, not getting a nose job. Or a divorce. I'm not euthanizing a pet. What I'm doing is, well, dumping my starter website for a new one. There, I admitted it. My hardworking, clever little flash pony of a website is going to that ephemeral corral in the sky, where it'll join other digital free agents (maybe there's a match.com for unattached websites? Think about it, an outerweb dating service?).
It really is dumb, what I'm doing, broadcasting this upcoming launch. It's worst practices to announce a website's birth before it's actually, um, born and has had its fingers and toes counted, but I'm thinking everyone's off on holiday, or watching basketball, or a movie, so, I'm doing it. Hard launching. Right here and now.
Poor Ira, my web developer, he's been laboring over this build--the new website is a bit of a princess (think, trophy wife), and she's given quite a headaches with all her frilly self-importance, but he's got her corset nearly laced, and sometime in the next 12 or 24 or 36 hours, the new suzyvitello will be unveiled. I hope.
So, farewell, little crab. I hope you meet someone really nice.
P.S. all you fans of the crab--the website's twin sister, wordsinahurry, is still going to be around, so you can get your flash fix.
Labels:
starter website
Friday, December 23, 2011
merry merry merry
Well, folks, I'm taking the holiday week off from most things cyber. But I shall return first thing 2012 with my fresh newly launched website, a few interviews with cool writerly types, and more sass and fancy.
Be well, and enjoy the splendors of this last week of 2011. May you occupy the full measure of your dreams.
Be well, and enjoy the splendors of this last week of 2011. May you occupy the full measure of your dreams.
Thursday, December 22, 2011
a few of our favorite things
1. Sushi. I remember one particular Christmas Eve taking Sam and Maggie to a sushi restaurant when most people were either at church or carving into a hunk of roasted meat. What seemed an odd thing to do that night turned into a welcome break from the usual holiday stuff-fest where sugar, butter and overindulgence reign supreme.
3. Eggs Benedict. Whatever I said about combating excess with sushi, it'll never apply to Christmas morning. Eggs Benedict is always on the menu, and must be eaten prior to any gift unwrapping.
What about you? Any gotta-do-it-every-year rituals you feel like sharing?
Labels:
holiday traditions
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
my cups runeth over
Here's a bevvy of gifts given to me recently by an assortment of my favorite people. Folks who know me well. Know what I drink and how I behave. (I fear that Santa is, right this very minute, getting his coal chute ready to load my stocking up.)
I'm a huge fan of unabashed over-the-top gift exchange. I'm not talking Eartha Kitt sparkles and gold mind you--just gifts that reflect the personalities and heart of the giver, the receiver, or both. Our oldest kids--married and now expecting their first child--made kaluha last year, and personalized stationery wrapped in Pacific Northwest twine and brown paper. Kirk's brother and sister-in-law gave us tea they'd harvested from flowers and herbs in their yard. My dad wrote us a check and sent along a "house divided" doormat reflecting our split college team allegiance. All the gifts resonated completely with who we know these people to be.
I love perusing the various "put a bird on it" places Portland has become famous for and finding little things that somehow speak to my kids or husband. Tiny trinkets to fill a basket or stocking. It's inevitable, now that we're in that final countdown, that I'll be logging more miles on the plastic at the last minute. So be it.
What are your wishes for Christmas? (Besides peace on earth, I mean.)
I'm a huge fan of unabashed over-the-top gift exchange. I'm not talking Eartha Kitt sparkles and gold mind you--just gifts that reflect the personalities and heart of the giver, the receiver, or both. Our oldest kids--married and now expecting their first child--made kaluha last year, and personalized stationery wrapped in Pacific Northwest twine and brown paper. Kirk's brother and sister-in-law gave us tea they'd harvested from flowers and herbs in their yard. My dad wrote us a check and sent along a "house divided" doormat reflecting our split college team allegiance. All the gifts resonated completely with who we know these people to be.
I love perusing the various "put a bird on it" places Portland has become famous for and finding little things that somehow speak to my kids or husband. Tiny trinkets to fill a basket or stocking. It's inevitable, now that we're in that final countdown, that I'll be logging more miles on the plastic at the last minute. So be it.
What are your wishes for Christmas? (Besides peace on earth, I mean.)
Monday, December 19, 2011
santa baby
Eartha Kitt is just so steamy with her, "Come and trim my Christmas tree." The spirit behind this song is so sultry and fun. Who wouldn't want a yacht or a platinum mine?
I'll settle for some chocolate from Alma though.
Labels:
eartha kitt,
santa baby
Sunday, December 18, 2011
on winning
Ask my husband, he'll tell you that I'm scary competitive. I hate losing. I'm strategic to the point of ridiculous with the games.
Tonight we played Smart Ass at a dinner party in teams of three. Then we switched to Scattegories. My team won Smart Ass, and I won a round of Scattegories and I was quite self-satisfied.
I hate losing. I really, really do. I've grown out of throwing hissy fits, but I still simmer angrily when the cards or dice don't fall my way. I'm a big, fat baby.
While I was at this dinner party, my 12-year-old was playing an indoor soccer game. He called me up to give me the blow-by-blow. It was one of those tied up until the last 10 seconds and he scored the winning goal deals. As it should be. Forever and ever amen.Winning concretized by dramatic example.
So what is it about winning? It's so completely unpermanent. It's like, okay, you got the most, the highest the best score, but tomorrow, you'll wake up and start all over. Square one. Chutes and ladders. Groundhog's Day. Sucker. Or is winning more of a cumulative thing?
I remember the semester I decided to be an anthropology major as an undergrad. I took this Indian survey class, and I learned that Hopi children only win when they all reach the finish line at the same time. Really? How fucked up is that? But at the time, I was an idealistic 20-year-old and I thought that was terrific. There are more important things than being first, I believed.
Now, I think the idea of winning is a little more complex. Outside of a parlor game, winning--being first--is more about how you feel at the end of the day. For me it has to do with how closely my day matched the template I created that morning. You know the drill: lists, priorities, tasks, goals. I "win" if I feel like I accomplished what I set out to do. I "lose" if I got derailed.
Lots of people live their lives making it up as they go along. I used to do that. In fact, I think my basic temperament has that tendency as a default. But years of living with someone whose life was one derail after another had me switching tracks in order to prevent a complete collapse of our basic existence. I'd say my deal these days is about setting an intention, and then allowing for the various miracles and human exchanges to bend that intention.The process relies heavily on intuition. I make a lot of mistakes. Denial sometimes enjoys too wide a berth with that policy, but all in all, I've managed to win more days than not following that paradigm, so I'm not planning on giving it up anytime soon.
I am curious though, about how others see the idea of "winning" in a granular, daily sort of way. Anybody?
Tonight we played Smart Ass at a dinner party in teams of three. Then we switched to Scattegories. My team won Smart Ass, and I won a round of Scattegories and I was quite self-satisfied.
I hate losing. I really, really do. I've grown out of throwing hissy fits, but I still simmer angrily when the cards or dice don't fall my way. I'm a big, fat baby.
While I was at this dinner party, my 12-year-old was playing an indoor soccer game. He called me up to give me the blow-by-blow. It was one of those tied up until the last 10 seconds and he scored the winning goal deals. As it should be. Forever and ever amen.Winning concretized by dramatic example.
So what is it about winning? It's so completely unpermanent. It's like, okay, you got the most, the highest the best score, but tomorrow, you'll wake up and start all over. Square one. Chutes and ladders. Groundhog's Day. Sucker. Or is winning more of a cumulative thing?
I remember the semester I decided to be an anthropology major as an undergrad. I took this Indian survey class, and I learned that Hopi children only win when they all reach the finish line at the same time. Really? How fucked up is that? But at the time, I was an idealistic 20-year-old and I thought that was terrific. There are more important things than being first, I believed.
Now, I think the idea of winning is a little more complex. Outside of a parlor game, winning--being first--is more about how you feel at the end of the day. For me it has to do with how closely my day matched the template I created that morning. You know the drill: lists, priorities, tasks, goals. I "win" if I feel like I accomplished what I set out to do. I "lose" if I got derailed.
Lots of people live their lives making it up as they go along. I used to do that. In fact, I think my basic temperament has that tendency as a default. But years of living with someone whose life was one derail after another had me switching tracks in order to prevent a complete collapse of our basic existence. I'd say my deal these days is about setting an intention, and then allowing for the various miracles and human exchanges to bend that intention.The process relies heavily on intuition. I make a lot of mistakes. Denial sometimes enjoys too wide a berth with that policy, but all in all, I've managed to win more days than not following that paradigm, so I'm not planning on giving it up anytime soon.
I am curious though, about how others see the idea of "winning" in a granular, daily sort of way. Anybody?
Saturday, December 17, 2011
the distraction of me
Facebook is taking self-referential (okay, let's call it what it is: unbridled narcissism) to new and spectacular heights with Timeline.
That said, it's really excellent! How many ways can there be to say ME?!
Here's a few. Feel free to chime in with your greatest hits!
So, Facebookers, whatcha think of Timeline: Fun distraction, or the slippery slope of ME-VIL?
That said, it's really excellent! How many ways can there be to say ME?!
Here's a few. Feel free to chime in with your greatest hits!
- Here's looking at ME kid.
- I and love and ME.
- Someone like ME makes it hard to love, somebody else.
- Do re mi ME ME ME
- I am the sunshine of my life.
- Even though we ain't got money, I'm so in love with ME honey..
- Well, you get the picture.
So, Facebookers, whatcha think of Timeline: Fun distraction, or the slippery slope of ME-VIL?
Labels:
facebook timeline
Friday, December 16, 2011
from the archives: revising during "the season"
December is galloping along the way it always does. Candles, boughs of holly, ornaments, gingerbread creatures and their lairs. Who put all of these props on the stage? And then there's the concerts, plays, parties and festivals. Wassail? Why not! It's been a while since I had night free of alcohol.
I am a big fan of the seasonal hyperbole. As long as I stay clear of malls, I'm not unduly affected by the stress of too many people, spending too much money and the ennui that comes with abject commercialism.
My biggest complaint about December is that it's really hard to hunker down with the pages. Especially revision. Writing new stuff aligns with the mania of December. Sober judgment of existing work--not so much.
This Sunday afternoon, I'm thinking of sequestering myself in my office in order to tweak sentences, gain clarity on voice consistency, make back-story pacing decisions and to hopefully solve a host of other second draft problems, and I hope my brain cooperates instead of pining for whimsy and baubles and rum balls.
This is an encore presentation of a post from 2009 (because it still applies!)
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








